ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Effects of feeding high-moisture corn on performance, meat quality, and cecal microbiota of Jinling Yellow chickens.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of high- moisture corn (HMC) on the performance, meat quality, and cecal microbiota of Jinling Yellow chickens. A total of 216 healthy male Jinling Yellow chickens were randomly assigned to three dietary groups: a control group (CK, 100% dry cracked corn), an HMC50% group (50% dry cracked corn + 50% HMC), and an HMC100% group (100% HMC). Each group consisted of three replicate pens with 24 birds per pen, and the trial included a 7‑day adaptation period followed by a 60‑ day feeding period. On day 60, growth performance, slaughter traits, muscle nutrients, meat quality, untargeted metabolomics, and cecal 16S rRNA sequencing were evaluated. The HMC100% group showed significantly lower average daily gain (ADG) than the CK group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.