Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676890›Full record

ReviewSAGE open medicine2026

PCR-based detection of cytomegalovirus in neonates and children, with emphasis on congenital and neonatal-screening cohorts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Manal Abdel Haleem A Abusalah, Mai Abdel Haleem A Abusalah, Samana Raheem, Alqassem Hamdallah Abuarqoub, Wardah Yusof, Chan Yean Yean, Zeehaida Mohamed, Ali M Atoom, Abdirahman Hussein Elmi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SAGE open medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manal Abdel Haleem A AbusalahDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8840-9139
Mai Abdel Haleem A AbusalahDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Samana RaheemDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Alqassem Hamdallah AbuarqoubDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Wardah YusofDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
Chan Yean YeanDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
Zeehaida MohamedDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
Ali M AtoomDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9742-4253
Abdirahman Hussein ElmiDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the commoner infections of childhood and the leading non-genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss. Diagnosis in children is not straightforward. Serology is hard to interpret in early life and viral culture is slow and often insensitive, and neither method suits testing at scale. CMV detection using PCR is easier, but sample type, format, and age affect accuracy. We reviewed how well PCR-based CMV testing performs in neonates and children, and how much the available studies differ from one another. Methods: The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed were searched for English-language reports published between January 2000 and February 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported PCR-based CMV detection in saliva, urine, dried blood spots, whole blood, plasma, serum or amniotic fluid; accuracy was then compared across these specimen types. Quality was assessed with QUADAS-2. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and false-positive rate came from random-effects and bivariate Reitsma models, and further analyses were run by specimen type, age group and test format. Results: We identified 52 studies examining PCR-based CMV detection from neonates to 18 years of age. We analyzed diagnostic accuracy, specimen type performance, prevalence, PCR techniques, geographical distribution, and risk of bias using QUADAS-2. Seven 2×2 tables drawn from five publications, representing four independent research programmes, yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.898 (95% CI: 0.489-0.988) and a pooled specificity of 0.998 (95% CI: 0.975-1.000), with an area under the summary ROC curve of 0.991. Results for saliva were the most consistent (sensitivity 0.974-1.000). Dried blood spots varied much more, from 0.283 under universal newborn screening to 0.953 where testing was directed at high-risk neonates. Between-study heterogeneity was substantial overall (I Conclusion: Real-time PCR on saliva or urine appears accurate enough to be useful in neonatal CMV screening. The pooled estimates should still be read cautiously, given how much the studies differed and the lower sensitivity recorded for dried blood spots.

Indexed as

agecytomegaloviruses infectionsdiagnostic evaluationmeta-analysispediatricspecimenssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42676890
PMCPMC13527362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.