ArticleHardwareX2026
An open-source low-power wheel detector node for urban rail monitoring.
Article in HardwareX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wheel-passage monitoring is relevant to non-safety-critical railway applications such as temporary traffic observation, maintenance support measurements, and open-hardware field experimentation. This study presents an open-source, low-power wheel detector developed as a monitoring-oriented railway sensing node for operation under real field conditions. The proposed hardware combines a mechanically preloaded pedal, a reed-switch-based triggering arrangement, and an ultra-low-power electronic subsystem built around a prototype control platform. In deep-sleep mode, the prototype consumes approximately 10 µA. The mechanical behavior of the detector was analysed using MATLAB/Simscape, focusing on wheel-pedal contact, preload selection, transient displacement response, and contact-pressure evolution with wheel speed. Preload optimization based on an overshoot criterion showed that 24 mm is the minimum preload required to eliminate secondary penetration. At 90 km/h, the model predicted full damping within 17.076 ms, remaining below the 30 ms digital filtering window and thereby supporting stable single-event generation. A damping sensitivity analysis showed that this timing margin is preserved under reasonable variation of the assumed structural damping. Within the adopted reduced-order 2D plane-strain model with isotropic hardening, the cyclic elastoplastic assessment predicted a shakedown-like response, with residual vertical indentation approaching 0.70 mm, well below the 5 mm triggering allowance of the reed-switch mechanism. A field-installed prototype was evaluated over the 0-90 km/h speed range. A total of 500 monitored wheel-passage events were assessed, with no missed detections and no visible wheel-flange deformation after testing. The results support the feasibility of a low-cost, ultra-low-power, open-source wheel-passage detector for non-safety-critical railway monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.