ReviewAnesthesiology research and practice2026
Effect of Perioperative Benzodiazepine Use on Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Perioperative Benzodiazepine Use on Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiac surgery anesthesia is associated with risks such as postoperative delirium (POD) and stress-related responses. Benzodiazepines have been used perioperatively to reduce anxiety and promote hemodynamic control. However, their use may increase the risk of delirium, particularly in older adults. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of perioperative benzodiazepine use on the incidence of POD in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing benzodiazepines with placebo or nonbenzodiazepine drugs in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was POD incidence; secondary outcomes included mini-mental state examination (MMSE), ICU length of stay, and time to extubation. For dichotomous outcomes, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, while mean differences (MDs) were used for continuous outcomes. Analyses were performed using R 4.4.3. Results: Eight studies were included, comprising 36,301 patients, of whom 20,747 (68.5%) received benzodiazepines. Follow-up ranged from 1 day to 12 months. There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of POD (OR 1.05; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.25; Conclusion: Perioperative benzodiazepine use was not significantly associated with POD or with secondary outcomes in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.