Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676822›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in fungal biology2026

Mechanistic evidence and assumptions in mycotoxin-gut interaction.

Esther Garcia-Cela, Alessandra Marcon Gasperini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in fungal biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Esther Garcia-CelaMycoLab, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Alessandra Marcon GasperiniUCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycotoxins are increasingly recognised as ecological mediators that act through a bidirectional gut-microbiota axis. Microbial metabolism governs toxin fate by driving detoxification, bioactivation, sequestration and deconjugation, whereas mycotoxin exposure reshapes microbial communities, disrupts epithelial barrier function and amplifies immune signalling. Across aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, fumonisin B1, deoxynivalenol and T-2 toxin, the microbiome emerges as both a determinant and a target of toxicity, with strain-level functional diversity influencing susceptibility, detoxification capacity and host outcome. A further consequence of chronic exposure may be selection for pathobionts and antibiotic-resistant populations, raising the possibility that mycotoxins contribute to microbiome instability beyond direct toxic effects. Despite these advances, most evidence remains correlative or model-specific, and causal validation

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancedysbiosisgut microbiotahost–microbiota interactionsintestinal barriermicrobial detoxificationmycotoxinsxenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID42676822
PMCPMC13527017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.