ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Assessing health, wellbeing, and working life impacts of a 4-day week: a multimodal protocol.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long working hours can negatively affect workers' health, wellbeing, and work performance. Previous trials reducing working time have found improvements in multiple aspects of wellbeing, including sleep, job satisfaction, and reduced burnout, while maintaining performance. However, the potential psychological and biological mechanisms underlying these improvements, including immune function and brain function, remain unexplored. Therefore, the aim of this study is to understand the bidirectional relationship between working patterns and physical and mental health, and how workplace performance is affected. We aim to test at least 150 working-age adults in the UK (approximately half with a working time reduction and no loss of salary, and half controls with no change in working patterns) in a 14-week trial, including a 2-week baseline period, with additional participants completing questionnaires only. The primary outcome measure is the difference in physical and mental health from baseline to the end of the trial among participants undergoing a reduction in working time, compared with the control group. Data collection is currently underway, and while the majority of employers in the working time reduction group adopt a 4-day week format, the specific change in working patterns is flexible and varies between employers according to their operational need, including a 9-day fortnight, two half-days and shorter working days. Core variables include brain structure and function, sleep, immune function, interoception (perception of bodily sensations), time use, diet, mental health, and workplace performance and engagement. Secondary outcomes include weekly monitoring of self-reported wellbeing changes to identify key inflection points and assess whether these are maintained at a 6-month follow-up. Overall, this study aims to generate highly novel multimodal data on the psychological and biological implications of working time reduction, including observed changes in health, wellbeing, and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.