ArticleDigital health
AI-driven health misinformation in Somalia's digital era: A neglected crisis demanding global action.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) and generative technologies is transforming global health communication, but it is also accelerating the spread of health misinformation, particularly in fragile and low-resource settings. Somalia, characterized by limited digital health literacy, weak regulatory frameworks, and increasing reliance on social media for health information, represents a highly vulnerable context for AI-driven infodemics. This Letter to the Editor examines the emerging threat of AI-generated health misinformation in Somalia's digital landscape, highlighting its potential to undermine public trust, distort health behaviours, and weaken epidemic preparedness. It also explores the dual role of AI as both a risk amplifier and a potential solution, particularly through automated misinformation detection, digital health education, and multilingual information dissemination. Evidence suggests that generative AI tools can produce highly persuasive false health content at scale, making it difficult for users to distinguish between credible and misleading information. In Somalia, where institutional fact-checking mechanisms and digital governance structures remain underdeveloped, these risks are further intensified. The letter argues for urgent multisectoral action involving policymakers, healthcare institutions, academic bodies, and technology platforms to strengthen digital health literacy, establish AI governance frameworks, and enhance real-time misinformation surveillance. Addressing these challenges is essential to safeguarding public health, strengthening health system resilience, and ensuring equitable access to accurate health information in the digital era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.