ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Experiences of families using an early example of a neighbourhood multidisciplinary care team for children and young people in Birmingham, UK: a qualitative exploration of acceptability.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service is attempting to address the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions, including obesity, and mental ill health among children and young people (CYP) by creating neighbourhood multi-disciplinary teams (NMDTs). These challenges to the health and well-being of CYP are particularly pronounced amongst underserved populations and it is expected that combining health services and social care services can help address these ongoing inequalities. Despite this significant shift in the delivery of care, there is a lack of robust evidence on families' experiences of these integrated services to inform their development. This work helps address this by providing a qualitative exploration of the acceptability to families of an early example of an NMDT for CYP, the "Sparkbrook Children's Zone", as delivered in Birmingham, UK. Methods: The study used data collected from two focus groups conducted with eight parents whose children had been treated by the Sparkbrook Children's Zone. The data were analysed using a directed content analysis to populate the relevant domains of Sekhon's theoretical framework of acceptability. Results: In summary (by domain), we found that that individuals' awareness of the service was derived from a range of sources and, although understanding that the service was multidisciplinary, they were sometimes unsure of the precise organisations involved ( Discussion: Parents appeared to be strongly in favour of the collocated multi-disciplinarity of the service over their usual primary care. However, more work was needed with larger sample sizes, a broader range of demographies, and across services that offered alternative staffing models. In this way, service leads and commissioners could better understand the key characteristics of NMDTs that influenced patient and family acceptability and engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.