ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2026
A review on toxicities of T-cell engager-based therapies in solid tumors.
Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T-cell engager (TCE)-based therapies represent an emerging and rapidly expanding class of immunotherapies in oncology. Initially developed for hematologic malignancies, TCEs are now entering the field of solid tumors. To date, two agents have received regulatory approval in this setting: Tebentafusp for metastatic uveal melanoma and Tarlatamab for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). By physically linking a tumor-associated antigen (TAA) to a T-cell activating domain, most commonly cluster of differentiation (CD) 3, TCEs induce an immunological synapse that promotes targeted T-cell mediated cytotoxicity. This narrative review summarizes the most clinically relevant toxicities associated with TCEs in solid tumors, drawing on data from clinical trials and real-world experience. Tebentafusp exemplifies the safety profile of this therapeutic class, which is dominated by cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and cutaneous adverse events (AEs). These toxicities are typically early in onset, predictable, and reversible, occurring predominantly during the initial step-up dosing phase and decreasing substantially with subsequent administrations, consistent with immune adaptation. Tarlatamab, a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) × CD3 bispecific TCE recently approved for SCLC, displays a toxicity profile similarly driven by immune activation, with CRS as the most frequent AE, generally of low grade and confined to early treatment cycles. In contrast, neurotoxicity including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurs more frequently, though events are usually low grade, delayed relative to CRS. Other TCEs currently in clinical development target a wide range of TAAs and display a broadly similar toxicity profile, with CRS emerging as a class effect related to CD3-mediated T-cell activation. The incidence and severity of CRS are influenced by dosing strategies, with step-up dosing mitigating early toxicity. Cutaneous, immune-related, and hematologic AEs are generally infrequent and rarely severe. Continued optimization of antigen selection, molecular engineering, and pharmacokinetic parameters will be critical to improving the safety profile of TCEs gathering data from clinical trials and real-world experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.