Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676735›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in dental medicine2026

Comparison of the efficacy of placental extract gel vs. curcumin gel in the treatment of oral aphthous ulcer: a randomized clinical trial.

Seemadevi Thangeswaran, Naganandini S, Alexander Maniangat Luke, Mohamed Saleh Hamad Ingafou

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seemadevi ThangeswaranDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, NIMS Dental College & Hospital, Rajasthan, India.
Naganandini SDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, NIMS Dental College & Hospital, Rajasthan, India.
Alexander Maniangat LukeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Mohamed Saleh Hamad IngafouDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Canker sores are among the most common oral mucosal lesions with an unclear etiology. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) causes considerable pain and discomfort, affecting quality of life. Aim: To compare the efficacy of placental extract gel (PEG) and curcumin gel in the management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Settings and design: A randomized clinical trial conducted in the Department of Public Health Dentistry. Methods and material: Thirty participants diagnosed with RAS were randomly allocated into two groups: Group I (PEG, Statistical analysis: An independent Results: Both groups showed significant reductions in ulcer size and pain scores by day 3 and day 7 ( Conclusion: Both placental extract gel and curcumin gel were effective in reducing pain and ulcer size in recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Placental extract gel demonstrated lower recurrence rates compared with curcumin gel. No adverse effects were observed in either group; however, this study was not powered to detect differences in safety outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=CTRI/2023/11/059637, Identifier: CTRI/2023/11/059637.

Indexed as

canker sorescurcuminoral mucosal lesionsplacental extract gelrecurrent aphthous stomatitis

Identifiers

PMID42676735
PMCPMC13527776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.