ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Distal resection margins before and after fixation: a comparative analysis in rectal cancer surgery.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Formalin fixation may cause measurable changes in the dimensions of surgical specimens, which may potentially affect the pathological assessment of distal margins in rectal cancer surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the differences between distal margin measurements obtained from fresh specimens and those recorded after fixation. Methods: Rectal cancer specimens from patients who underwent anterior or low anterior resection were retrospectively analyzed. Distal margins were measured macroscopically on fresh specimens during intraoperative pathological assessment and then remeasured after formalin fixation. Differences between the prefixation and postfixation measurements were calculated, and the shrinkage rates were determined. Results: Sixty patients were included in this analysis. The mean distal margin decreased from 4.39 ± 1.95 cm in fresh specimens to 3.90 ± 2.04 cm after fixation, corresponding to a mean reduction of 0.49 cm (95% CI: 0.26-0.71 cm) and an average shrinkage of 13.2%. No specimen had a distal margin shorter than 1 cm on fresh measurement; however, after fixation, two specimens were reported to have margins below this threshold. During a median follow-up of 46.5 months, exploratory analyses did not identify a clear association between the postfixation distal margin category (<2 cm vs. ≥ 2 cm) and oncological outcomes; however, these analyses were based on small subgroups and should be interpreted with caution. Among the two patients with a distal margin <1 cm after fixation, neither developed a local recurrence, although one developed a distant recurrence during follow-up. Conclusion: Formalin fixation results in a measurable reduction in the distal margin length in rectal cancer specimens. Although this reduction is generally modest, it may occasionally influence the pathological interpretation of distal clearance, particularly in borderline cases. These findings should be interpreted in the context of specimen processing and do not necessarily indicate a true oncological inadequacy. Larger studies evaluating long-term oncological outcomes are required to further clarify the clinical implications of fixation-related margin shortening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.