ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
BLAP: lesion-aware adaptive multi-scale visual prompt tuning for few-shot crop disease diagnosis.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Applying general-purpose vision-language models (VLMs) to crop disease diagnosis presents three critical bottlenecks: reliance on large-scale annotated data, the high computational cost of full finetuning, and existing adaptation methods designed mainly for discriminative classification without sufficient visual-linguistic interaction for generative diagnosis. Methods: We propose BLAP, an adaptive multi-scale visual prompt fine-tuning framework built upon BLIP-2. BLAP introduces an adaptive visual prompt fusion module (APFM) with learnable prompt vectors and a gating mechanism, together with a multi-scale pyramid feature fusion module (PFM). All BLIP-2 backbone parameters are frozen, and only 0.11% of the model parameters are optimized. Results: On a few-shot dataset comprising 990 images from 11 crops and 33 disease categories, BLAP achieved 92.78% recognition accuracy, outperforming the BLIP-2+LoRA baseline by 21.67 percentage points. BLEU-4 and ROUGE-L scores reached 0.6507 and 0.7184, respectively, while inference latency increased by only 2.15%. Discussion: BLAP provides a lightweight solution that balances accuracy, efficiency, and interpretability for crop disease diagnosis in resource-constrained settings. The proposed dynamic prompt fusion and multiscale pyramid adaptation strategy may also be extended to parameter-efficient fine-tuning of visionlanguage models in other domain-specific applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.