Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676667›Full record

ReviewInfection prevention in practice2026

Clinical waste management.

Maeve Leonard, Aedín Hanahoe, Hugo Cruz, Anna Rose Prior

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection prevention in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maeve LeonardTallaght University Hospital, Ireland.
Aedín HanahoeTallaght University Hospital, Ireland.
Hugo CruzTallaght University Hospital, Ireland.
Anna Rose PriorTallaght University Hospital, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical waste management is a central component to infection prevention and control (IPC) practice across the UK and Ireland, with effective implementation of waste management being critical to a functioning healthcare system. Healthcare organisations have a duty of care to provide a safe service that correctly manages potentially hazardous clinical waste for the safety of both staff and patients. Key guidance for best practice clinical waste management in the National Health Service (NHS) is outlined in the 'UK: Health Technical Memorandum 07-01: Safe and sustainable management of healthcare waste' and aligns with the NHS clinical waste strategy published in March 2023. Significant barriers to the successful implementation of these guidelines in the healthcare setting are often encountered. The infection prevention specialist plays an essential role in the education of healthcare staff to ensure the guidelines are adhered to at a practical level and to provide understanding of the waste management hierarchy. It is important to involve all key stakeholders to ensure the best chance of a positive outcome. Hospital management is responsible for ensuring there is a clear waste management policy and ensuring the engagement of competent, certified waste contractors. The IPC team members are key stakeholders with responsibility for setting and implementing standards on how waste is segregated to prevent infection spread. The hospital's Green Committee should also be involved to support delivery of a service with sustainability and costs to the forefront, in accordance with the 'Net Zero Carbon' targets.

Indexed as

Clinical waste managementInfection prevention and controlSustainability

Identifiers

PMID42676667
PMCPMC13527495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.