ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Validation of the Reaction Time-Based False-Positive Rate as a Reliability Index for Standard Automated Perimetry.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To validate a reaction time (RT)-based false-positive rate (RT-FP) for standard automated perimetry (SAP) and to determine the optimal RT listening window. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 1201 eyes from 607 glaucoma patients tested with the AIZE algorithm (imo perimeter, 24plus[1-2] pattern). Methods: Reaction time-based FP rate was defined as the proportion of stimulus responses below a defined RT listening window, excluding catch trials. Listening windows of 100, 200, and 300 ms were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis against conventional catch-trial FP rate ≥15%. The effect of excluding responses at locations with estimated threshold ≤0, ≤5, ≤10, and ≤15 dB on the association between RT-FP and disease severity was evaluated using Spearman correlation with mean deviation (MD). Relative variability of each FP index was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV). Main Outcome Measures: Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for discriminating conventional FP ≥15%, Spearman correlation with MD and CV. Results: A 300-ms listening window achieved the highest discriminative accuracy (AUC = 0.783), outperforming 200-ms (AUC = 0.733) and 100-ms (AUC = 0.718) listening windows (both Conclusion: Reaction time-based FP rate with a 300-ms listening window restricted to locations with estimated threshold >10 dB substantially reduced metric dependence on disease severity to levels comparable to conventional FP, with greater measurement stability and no requirement for dedicated catch trials. This optimized RT-FP represents a promising reliability index for SAP warranting prospective validation. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.