ArticleGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2026
Lithium and Water: Why Hydrological Limits Will Define a Just Energy Transition.
Article in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lithium is widely portrayed as a cornerstone of the global energy transition. Yet prevailing narratives conceptualize lithium primarily as a mineral resource while treating water impacts as secondary externalities. This Perspective argues that in arid and hyper-arid salt-flat systems, lithium extraction is fundamentally constrained by hydrological boundaries rather than by mineral availability or technological efficiency. Using the Salar de Atacama in northern Chile as an emblematic global case, we contend that brine-based lithium extraction constitutes a large-scale intervention in coupled hydrosocial systems, directly implicating a boundary for freshwater. We challenge techno-optimistic expectations surrounding efficiency improvements and emerging technologies such as direct lithium extraction, emphasizing instead cumulative impacts, persistent uncertainty, and uneven distributions of risk and benefit. Building on the water boundaries framework, we propose a shift toward water-bounded lithium governance grounded in basin-scale extraction limits, precaution under uncertainty, legal recognition of brines as water, and meaningful indigenous participation linked to extraction thresholds. Without re-centering water as the defining constraint, the energy transition risks reproducing environmental degradation and social injustice under the guise of sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.