Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676553›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in radiology2026

Cross-interface persistent memory for large language model-assisted radiology research workflows: a Claude-based proof-of-concept technical development.

Miguel Angarita, Lina M Acosta Buitrago, Juan Manuel Pérez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miguel AngaritaLaCardio - Fundación Cardioinfantil, Bogotá, Colombia.
Lina M Acosta BuitragoLaCardio - Fundación Cardioinfantil, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan Manuel PérezLaCardio - Fundación Cardioinfantil, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Large language model (LLM)-assisted radiology research and tool-development work is hampered by a practical form of memory loss we term cross-interface fragmentation: project context built in a web-based conversational interface is not available in a local coding-agent environment, and neither environment retains state across sessions. This forces researchers to manually reconstruct context at every session start and every interface transition. This technical development describes the design and a single-user, proof-of-concept functional demonstration of a Claude-based persistent-memory system intended to reduce this fragmentation for the software-engineering and research-organization layer of radiology AI projects. The system is not a clinical tool and does not process patient data. Materials and methods: We implemented an end-to-end pipeline integrating a custom web application (Created.app/Supabase), a self-hosted n8n automation server, the Claude API (Anthropic), GitHub version control, and the Obsidian knowledge-management application. A web session is summarized by the Claude API into six structured fields (summary, decisions, pending tasks, artifacts, errors, continuation point) and written as a per-project MEMORY.md file to GitHub; a complementary CLAUDE.md file holds accumulated technical context for the local coding agent. The study design is a single-user, single-operator proof-of-concept engineering validation across three concurrent development projects; no efficacy, usability, or clinical-outcome claim is made. Results: In functional testing, the pipeline transferred project context between the web and local-coding environments without manual copy-paste of session content. A representative 558-token session ( Conclusion: A persistent, cross-interface memory layer for LLM-assisted radiology research workflows is technically feasible with currently available components. As a proof of concept it is explicitly limited: single user, Claude-based, text-only, without quantitative extraction-accuracy benchmarking, and dependent on commercial APIs whose cost scales with use (fixed infrastructure plus variable per-session API cost). We discuss a vendor-neutral, open-weights configuration as the recommended direction for cost- and dependency-sensitive settings such as Latin America, and we report that the system has been used in practice to help organize the development of a separate radiology report quality-control tool.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical informaticslarge language modelslow-resource settingsopen-weights modelspersistent memoryproof of conceptradiology research workflow

Identifiers

PMID42676553
PMCPMC13527011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.