ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Explainable multimodal fusion model integrating clinical and quantitative CT features for preoperative prediction of high-grade histologic patterns in invasive lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate preoperative prediction of high-grade patterns in invasive lung adenocarcinoma is critical for effective treatment planning. This study aimed to construct an interpretable multimodal fusion model to predict high-grade pattern status by integrating clinical information and quantitative CT features, including radiomics, intratumoral heterogeneity, and three-dimensional fractal features. Methods: In this retrospective study, 743 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive lung adenocarcinoma from two centers were classified into positive and negative groups for high-grade patterns. Patients from the primary center (n=650) were divided into a training cohort (n=455) and an internal validation cohort (n=195), while the second center provided an external validation cohort (n=93). After extracting relevant clinical and imaging features, the optimal predictive model was identified from 80 combinations of various feature selection methods and machine learning algorithms. Results: The resulting multimodal fusion model demonstrated robust predictive performance, achieving an area under the curve of 0.848 (sensitivity 84.7%, specificity 71.1%) in the internal validation cohort and maintaining an area under the curve of 0.815 (sensitivity 85.1%, specificity 73.9%) in the external cohort. This integrated approach outperformed individual clinical or radiomics models, as well as standard classifiers such as XGBoost, logistic regression, and multilayer perceptrons. Decision curve analysis further demonstrated favorable potential clinical utility, with the combined model generally providing a higher net clinical benefit than the treat-all and treat-none strategies across the threshold probability range examined. Discussion: By employing Shapley Additive Explanations to ensure interpretability, this comprehensive predictive tool offers reliable support for preoperative risk stratification and facilitates more precise, individualized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.