ReviewNAR genomics and bioinformatics2026
From rules to foundation models: a comprehensive review of machine learning approaches for siRNA design.
Review in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are a clinically validated therapeutic modality with eight FDA-approved drugs, yet designing effective siRNAs remains computationally challenging due to complex dependencies on sequence composition, thermodynamic properties, target-site accessibility, and off-target interactions. Over two decades, computational approaches have evolved from empirical heuristics to deep learning systems integrating physical priors with learned representations. We review the complete landscape of machine learning methods for siRNA design, spanning classical scoring rules, pretrained RNA foundation models, transformer-based efficacy predictors, graph neural networks encoding siRNA/messenger RNA interaction topology, off-target prediction frameworks, and chemical modification-aware architectures. Across over 40 studies, we identify convergent findings: hybrid models integrating thermodynamic features with learned representations are among the strongest performers, although this evidence rests largely on single-model ablations and does not establish that foundation-model embeddings specifically are required; graph neural networks with leakage-aware data splitting address pervasive benchmark inflation; and off-target prediction has matured through empirical RNA-seq frameworks and structure-based features. We distinguish throughout between chemically unmodified siRNAs, which dominate public benchmarks, and the fully modified siRNAs used therapeutically, whose efficacy data remain scarce and whose prediction is correspondingly harder. We provide a taxonomy of methods, head-to-head performance comparisons, benchmark dataset descriptions, code availability, biology-informed interpretability analysis with formal saliency validation protocols, and concrete recommendations for advancing siRNA design. Critical gaps in uncertainty quantification, active learning, and prospective experimental validation are identified as priorities for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.