ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Stem cell and stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle therapy for traumatic brain injury: mechanisms, engineering and translation.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major unmet clinical challenge owing to its complex pathophysiology, profound heterogeneity, and limited regenerative capacity of the adult central nervous system (CNS). Existing therapeutic interventions are largely restricted to supportive management and fail to adequately address the secondary injury cascade characterized by persistent neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, vascular dysfunction, and progressive neurodegeneration. Against this backdrop, stem cell-based therapies have emerged as a rapidly expanding area of regenerative medicine with the potential to modulate multiple pathological processes simultaneously. In this Review, we summarize the therapeutic landscape of stem cell interventions for TBI, encompassing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and cell-free derivatives including extracellular vesicles (EVs) and exosomes. We discuss the mechanistic basis of stem cell-mediated repair, focusing on immune microenvironment remodeling, endogenous neurogenesis, neurovascular restoration, apoptosis regulation, and neural circuit reconstruction. We further examine recent advances in therapeutic engineering, including biomaterial-assisted delivery systems, nanotechnology-enabled platforms, preconditioning paradigms, and multimodal combinatorial strategies designed to overcome limitations associated with cell survival, targeting, and functional integration. Finally, we evaluate the current status of clinical translation and highlight the principal biological, technical, and regulatory challenges that continue to impede therapeutic standardization and large-scale implementation. A deeper understanding of stem cell-microenvironment interactions, coupled with advances in bioengineering and rigorous clinical validation, will be essential for translating regenerative strategies into clinically effective therapies for TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.