ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Beyond lipids: a precision prevention blueprint for China's residual risk.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite achieving guideline-recommended lipid levels, patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) retain substantial residual risk arising from heterogeneous biological pathways, including persistent inflammation and genetically determined atherogenic susceptibility. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) provides a pragmatic measure of potentially modifiable inflammatory activity, whereas lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] identifies relatively stable, genetically mediated risk that is not adequately captured by standard lipid panels. The 2025 American College of Cardiology Scientific Statement highlights hs-CRP as a clinically useful inflammatory-risk marker and supports consideration of low-dose colchicine in appropriately selected secondary-prevention patients. The 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidemia guideline further provides a Class I recommendation for once-in-a-lifetime Lp(a) measurement, creating a complementary multimodal framework for residual-risk assessment. In China, where cardiovascular disease accounts for a substantial proportion of deaths and the national cardiovascular burden continues to increase, implementation of this framework remains limited. Routine hs-CRP measurement is uncommon, cardiovascular use of colchicine remains negligible, and Lp(a) testing is still concentrated in selected tertiary centers. Emerging East Asian data and a recent Chinese expert advisory suggest that an hs-CRP threshold of approximately 1.0 mg/L may improve inflammatory-risk discrimination in Chinese patients with coronary artery disease; however, this threshold should not yet be interpreted as a stand-alone treatment threshold for colchicine. In this perspective, we compare international recommendations with current Chinese practice, analyze barriers related to infrastructure, safety, education, standardization, and evidence localization, and propose a multimodal implementation framework. Short-term priorities include once-in-a-lifetime Lp(a) measurement, context-specific hs-CRP assessment, intensified management of modifiable atherosclerotic risk factors, and carefully selected use of low-dose colchicine in secondary prevention. Elevated Lp(a) should prompt comprehensive risk-factor intensification and, when appropriate, family-based evaluation, but should not by itself constitute an indication for colchicine. Medium- and long-term priorities include pragmatic trials, real-world registries, assay standardization, cost-effectiveness studies, and policy initiatives to integrate residual-risk assessment into Chinese cardiovascular prevention pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.