ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting enteral nutrition-associated diarrhea in ICU patients: a multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: ICU patients receiving EN are at high risk of ENAD, which may adversely affect clinical outcomes and increase mortality risk. Early identification of patients at high risk of ENAD may facilitate timely risk assessment and the implementation of individualized nutritional management. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable ML-based model for predicting ENAD risk in critically ill patients. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included critically ill patients receiving EN at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University between January 2024 and December 2025. An independent external validation cohort was obtained from Shangrao People's Hospital during the same period. Twelve ML models were developed using R software. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, accuracy, precision, NPV, recall, and F1 score. Calibration curves and DCA were used to assess calibration and clinical utility. SHAP analysis was performed to visualize feature importance. Results: Among the 12 models, RF showed the best discriminative performance, with an AUC of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.769-0.853) in the test set and 0.808 (95% CI: 0.759-0.856) in the external validation cohort. Conclusion: The externally validated random forest model showed acceptable discriminative performance and provided an interpretable assessment of the contributions of individual features. The model may support static early risk stratification of ENAD among critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition. However, the available evidence remains insufficient to support its routine clinical implementation. Further validation in prospective studies, independent populations, and longitudinal clinical datasets is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.