ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Artificial intelligence for precision therapeutics in age-related macular degeneration: current advances, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide and is characterized by substantial clinical, imaging, and molecular heterogeneity that complicates disease prediction and therapeutic management. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and precision therapeutics have created new opportunities for more individualized and data-driven AMD care. AI models trained on multimodal datasets-including fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), genetic susceptibility loci (e.g., CFH, ARMS2/HTRA1, C3, CFI, and APOE), and longitudinal clinical information-have demonstrated promising capability in early disease detection, progression forecasting, biomarker identification, and prediction of treatment response. These developments align closely with emerging precision therapeutic strategies, including optimized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) regimens, complement-targeted therapies, gene-based interventions, and stem cell-associated regenerative approaches. This review provides a translational overview of AI-enabled precision therapeutics in AMD, with emphasis on multimodal biomarker integration, individualized therapeutic stratification, longitudinal disease monitoring, and clinically interpretable AI systems. Importantly, we further propose a Five-Level Clinical Readiness and Translational Utility Framework for AI in AMD Precision Therapeutics, categorizing AI applications according to evidence strength, clinical maturity, validation status, interpretability, and real-world implementation potential. The framework distinguishes near-reference-standard imaging AI systems, advanced clinical decision-support tools, emerging multimodal precision therapeutic AI, supportive workflow-oriented AI systems, and currently limited or unsuitable AI applications. Despite substantial progress, important translational barriers remain, including limited external validation, retrospective study designs, dataset heterogeneity, domain shift, insufficient explainability, regulatory uncertainty, and challenges related to workflow integration and real-world clinical deployment. Future advances in multimodal longitudinal AI, explainable AI, federated learning, digital health platforms, and multi-omics integration may facilitate a transition from reactive disease management toward more proactive, predictive, and personalized ophthalmic care. Collectively, AI-enabled precision therapeutics may help establish a more scalable and clinically integrated framework for individualized AMD management and future precision ophthalmology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.