Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676382›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Repeatability of ovarian antral follicular wave dynamics in women.

Gabriella Antaya, Heidi Vanden Brink, Chel Hee Lee, Angela Baerwald

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01389141 (Ovarian Follicular Wave Dynamics During The Menstrual Cycle), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01389141 completednot on this map

Ovarian Follicular Wave Dynamics During The Menstrual Cycle: Relationship To Age, Reproductive Hormones And Musculoskeletal Health

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of SaskatchewanRan2010 to 2011Enrolled70ConditionsAging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriella AntayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Heidi Vanden BrinkDepartment of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Chel Hee LeeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Angela BaerwaldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Two or three waves of follicular development have been documented in the human menstrual cycle; however, the repeatability of ovarian follicular wave dynamics across multiple cycles is not known. In the bovine species, the number of follicular waves has been documented to be repeatable in 2/3 of estrous cycles. We tested the hypotheses that the numbers and patterns of ovarian antral follicular waves in women are repeatable across cycles and become less repeatable with age. Methods: Transvaginal ultrasonography was conducted every 1-3 days over 2 interovulatory intervals (IOIs) for 22 participants. Participants of reproductive age (RA, age 18-35, n=14) and advanced reproductive age (ARA, age 36-55, n=8) were evaluated. The numbers and diameters of follicles ≥2 mm in each ovary were tabulated for each study visit following retrospective review of cineloops. Follicle waves were defined as an increase and subsequent decrease in the number of follicles ≥5 mm, associated with the growth of 2 or more follicles to ≥6 mm. Major waves were defined as a group of follicles from which a dominant follicle was selected for preferential growth. Conversely, in minor waves, selection of a dominant follicle did not occur. The numbers and patterns of follicle waves were compared between cycles and age groups. Results: The mean number of waves was 2.0 in cycle 1 and 2.1 in cycle, with no differences observed between age groups or cycles (p>0.1). Variability in minor and major wave patterns was reported among women, with no difference between age groups or cycles. Overall, 91% of women exhibited repeatability in the number of waves over the 2 IOIs (20/22 women) while 59% exhibited repeatability in wave patterns (13/22 women). Repeatability in the numbers and patterns of waves did not differ between age groups. Discussion: Data suggest that the numbers and patterns of antral follicular waves are repeatable across 2 cycles in the majority of women. Research is ongoing to further characterize antral follicular wave dynamics, which may enable personalization of ovarian stimulation therapies. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01389141.

Indexed as

Estrous CycleMenstrual CycleOvarian FollicleAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvulationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyYoung Adultantral follicle countantral follicular wavesfollicular waveovarian folliclerepeatability

Identifiers

PMID42676382
PMCPMC13526634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.