Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Repeatability of ovarian antral follicular wave dynamics in women.
Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01389141 (Ovarian Follicular Wave Dynamics During The Menstrual Cycle), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ovarian Follicular Wave Dynamics During The Menstrual Cycle: Relationship To Age, Reproductive Hormones And Musculoskeletal Health
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Two or three waves of follicular development have been documented in the human menstrual cycle; however, the repeatability of ovarian follicular wave dynamics across multiple cycles is not known. In the bovine species, the number of follicular waves has been documented to be repeatable in 2/3 of estrous cycles. We tested the hypotheses that the numbers and patterns of ovarian antral follicular waves in women are repeatable across cycles and become less repeatable with age. Methods: Transvaginal ultrasonography was conducted every 1-3 days over 2 interovulatory intervals (IOIs) for 22 participants. Participants of reproductive age (RA, age 18-35, n=14) and advanced reproductive age (ARA, age 36-55, n=8) were evaluated. The numbers and diameters of follicles ≥2 mm in each ovary were tabulated for each study visit following retrospective review of cineloops. Follicle waves were defined as an increase and subsequent decrease in the number of follicles ≥5 mm, associated with the growth of 2 or more follicles to ≥6 mm. Major waves were defined as a group of follicles from which a dominant follicle was selected for preferential growth. Conversely, in minor waves, selection of a dominant follicle did not occur. The numbers and patterns of follicle waves were compared between cycles and age groups. Results: The mean number of waves was 2.0 in cycle 1 and 2.1 in cycle, with no differences observed between age groups or cycles (p>0.1). Variability in minor and major wave patterns was reported among women, with no difference between age groups or cycles. Overall, 91% of women exhibited repeatability in the number of waves over the 2 IOIs (20/22 women) while 59% exhibited repeatability in wave patterns (13/22 women). Repeatability in the numbers and patterns of waves did not differ between age groups. Discussion: Data suggest that the numbers and patterns of antral follicular waves are repeatable across 2 cycles in the majority of women. Research is ongoing to further characterize antral follicular wave dynamics, which may enable personalization of ovarian stimulation therapies. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01389141.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.