ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Inner beauty supplement label information cues, consumer trust, and purchase intentions: cross-sectional evidence from South Korean consumers.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Health supplement labels serve as a critical psychological interface through which consumers process health-relevant information and form trust judgments. This cross-sectional study examines how perceived label information cues are associated with consumer trust and self-reported purchase intentions among inner beauty supplement consumers in South Korea. Drawing on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) as an information-processing framework and Signaling Theory as a framework for perceived credibility, the study focuses on five label cue types: functional emphasis, outcome-focused expression, scientific evidence expression, emotional expression, and visual label credibility. Methods: A quantitative survey was administered to 502 consumers who had purchased and consumed inner beauty supplements within the preceding 6 months. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, multiple regression, and both separate and integrated bootstrapped indirect association analyses. Results: The CFA results supported the seven-factor measurement model, and additional validity diagnostics supported construct reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. All five label cue types were positively associated with consumer trust. Functional emphasis, scientific evidence expression, emotional expression, and visual label credibility were also uniquely associated with purchase intention in the multiple regression model, whereas outcome-focused expression was not. Separate bootstrapped indirect association models showed significant indirect associations through consumer trust for all five cue types. In the integrated model, functional emphasis, scientific evidence expression, and emotional expression retained significant indirect associations through consumer trust, whereas outcome-focused expression and visual label credibility did not. Discussion: These indirect association findings should be interpreted as statistical indirect associations rather than as evidence of causal pathways, mechanisms, or exclusive indirect effects. Overall, the findings provide cross-sectional evidence that perceived label cues, product credibility, and purchase intentions are closely related in the inner beauty supplement context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.