ArticleGlobal health action2026
Current and potential uses of drones in healthcare delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a rapid scoping review.
Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drones are changing healthcare delivery, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where traditional logistics face geographical, infrastructural, and resource limitations. This review maps where drones have been used in SSA, how they have been used, the outcomes and challenges, and the potential to expand drone systems to address other healthcare problems. A rapid scoping review methodology was employed, sourcing literature from Google Scholar, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Cairn.info, and grey literature using targeted keywords such as 'drones,' 'medicine delivery,' and 'sub-Saharan Africa' to build a search query. Twenty-nine papers met the inclusion criteria, covering 12 countries, although the evidence base was heavily concentrated in Ghana and included a mix of peer-reviewed articles, technical reports, and media or organisational sources. Drone delivery systems have improved healthcare logistics across SSA by reducing delivery times, addressing rural access issues, improving maternal, neonatal, infectious disease, and emergency outcomes, and optimising supply chains. However, challenges such as payload limitations, dependency on donor funding, regulatory and policy restrictions, and workforce shortages hinder scalability. Drones have great potential for healthcare delivery in SSA, offering rapid, efficient, and cost-effective solutions that are transferable to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and to potential and emerging applications such as vector surveillance and public health messaging. While their contributions to improving maternal health and emergency response are notable, addressing systemic issues is crucial. Drones show promise for improving healthcare logistics in underserved settings, but their long-term value depends on resolving regulatory, infrastructural, workforce, and financing constraints, and on generating stronger comparative generalisable evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.