ArticleKorean journal of radiology2026
Prognostic Implications of CT- and MRI-Based LI-RADS Category M Features in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: An Intraindividual Comparison.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLiver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M (LR-M) is associated with a poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). However, the prognostic value of individual LR-M features across imaging modalities remains unclear. We aimed to determine, through intraindividual comparisons, whether the prognostic value of individual LR-M features differs between CT and MRI in patients with iCCA at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included consecutive patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B who underwent curative-intent resection for iCCA and preoperative multiphasic CT and MRI between 2010 and 2019. CT and MRI images were reviewed in separate sessions ≥4 weeks apart. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses with and without adjustment for LI-RADS categorization (non-LR-M vs. single-modality LR-M or dual-modality LR-M) were performed to evaluate the associations of CT- and MRI-based targetoid and non-targetoid LR-M features and other variables with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).
resultsA cohort of 122 patients (mean age, 57.9 ± 10.4 years) was included. MRI demonstrated significantly higher frequencies than CT for targetoid (84.4% vs. 73.8%,
conclusionThe prognostic implications of LR-M features in iCCA vary by imaging modality and feature type. CT-based targetoid and MRI-based non-targetoid features were associated with poorer survival, and the associations between MRI-based non-targetoid features and survival remained significant after adjustment for LI-RADS categorization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.