ArticleJournal of veterinary science2026
Measurement-based dosimetric comparison of kilovoltage and megavoltage X-ray systems for static-field 3D conformal radiotherapy in companion animals.
Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceKilovoltage (kV) X-ray radiotherapy systems have been introduced as a potential treatment option for companion animal radiotherapy, particularly for superficial targets. On the other hand, the lack of experimental validation of dose delivery accuracy has limited their broader clinical adoption.
objectiveA measurement-based dosimetric comparison was made between kV and megavoltage (MV) X-ray systems.
methodsA 300 kV X-ray radiotherapy system and a 6 MV linear accelerator were evaluated for percent depth dose, penetration depth, beam profiles, and field size output factors. Eight static-field plans were generated for targets at varying depths and tissue densities in an anthropomorphic head phantom. Point doses were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters and compared with treatment planning system-calculated doses. The calculated-to-measured absolute percentage differences were compared between the kV and MV systems using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a bootstrap 95% confidence interval.
resultsCompared with the MV beam, the kV X-ray beam exhibited a negligible buildup distance, higher field-size dependence, a pronounced heel effect, and substantially lower penetration depth. Despite these dissimilarities, the absolute differences between the calculated and measured point doses were 0.1%-4.0% and 3.1%-6.5% for the kV and MV systems, respectively, across different target depths and tissue densities. The differences were significantly smaller for kV (median paired difference, -1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.8 to -0.7; CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Under the evaluated static-field phantom conditions, the commissioned kV treatment-planning model showed calculated-to-measured differences of 0.1%-4.0%. Although these values were lower than those for MV, this finding does not establish higher dosimetric accuracy for the kV system because measurement-related uncertainties may have contributed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.