Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676017›Full record

ReviewJournal of veterinary science2026

Arthroscopy in specific joint pathologies of dogs and potential for application in wildlife species.

Young Deok Suh, Soeun Ryu, Do Na Lee, Seong Chan Yeon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Young Deok SuhDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0161-3805
Soeun RyuDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8060-9016
Do Na LeeDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-2258
Seong Chan YeonDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2490-6291

Funding

Specialized Graduate School Support Project for Wildlife Disease Specialists
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceArthroscopy has become an essential minimally invasive technique for both diagnostic and surgical applications in veterinary medicine. However, despite its established clinical utility in domestic small animals, particularly for the evaluation and management of arthropathies in major joints of dogs, its application in wildlife species remains limited. Expanding the use of arthroscopy in wildlife species may address important gaps in the diagnosis and management of arthropathies across diverse taxa. OBSERVATIONS: This narrative review demonstrates that arthroscopy is extensively utilized in small animals, especially dogs, for both diagnostic and therapeutic management of major joint disorders, supported by continuous developments in instrumentation and procedural techniques. In contrast, arthroscopic applications in wildlife species are largely confined to isolated case reports, with considerable variability in anatomical feasibility, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes, leading to a limited understanding of disease pathophysiology, treatment options, and clinical outcomes in non-domestic species. This disparity highlights a substantial gap in the evidence base regarding the use of arthroscopy across non-domestic species. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Arthroscopy provides a versatile and effective modality in veterinary orthopedics, with well-established applications in canine patients. However, its use in wildlife medicine remains limited and inconsistent. Continued refinement of arthroscopic equipment and techniques, along with the accumulation of clinical experience, may facilitate broader adoption in wildlife species. This review provides a timely overview of current practices and highlights clinically relevant gaps, supporting future research and potential clinical application in non-domestic species.

Indexed as

Animals, WildArthroscopyDog DiseasesJoint DiseasesAnimalsDogsarthropathiesMinimally invasive surgical proceduresorthopedic procedurestreatment outcomeveterinary medicine

Identifiers

PMID42676017
PMCPMC13655556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.