ReviewJournal of veterinary science2026
Arthroscopy in specific joint pathologies of dogs and potential for application in wildlife species.
Review in Journal of veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceArthroscopy has become an essential minimally invasive technique for both diagnostic and surgical applications in veterinary medicine. However, despite its established clinical utility in domestic small animals, particularly for the evaluation and management of arthropathies in major joints of dogs, its application in wildlife species remains limited. Expanding the use of arthroscopy in wildlife species may address important gaps in the diagnosis and management of arthropathies across diverse taxa. OBSERVATIONS: This narrative review demonstrates that arthroscopy is extensively utilized in small animals, especially dogs, for both diagnostic and therapeutic management of major joint disorders, supported by continuous developments in instrumentation and procedural techniques. In contrast, arthroscopic applications in wildlife species are largely confined to isolated case reports, with considerable variability in anatomical feasibility, surgical approaches, and clinical outcomes, leading to a limited understanding of disease pathophysiology, treatment options, and clinical outcomes in non-domestic species. This disparity highlights a substantial gap in the evidence base regarding the use of arthroscopy across non-domestic species. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Arthroscopy provides a versatile and effective modality in veterinary orthopedics, with well-established applications in canine patients. However, its use in wildlife medicine remains limited and inconsistent. Continued refinement of arthroscopic equipment and techniques, along with the accumulation of clinical experience, may facilitate broader adoption in wildlife species. This review provides a timely overview of current practices and highlights clinically relevant gaps, supporting future research and potential clinical application in non-domestic species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.