Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675937›Full record

ArticleJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2026

Increased Gait Variability while Texting and Walking with Added Cognitive Loads in Challenging Environments.

Chi-Whan Choi, Simone V Gill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chi-Whan ChoiSargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, USA.
Simone V GillSargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study investigated (1) whether additional cognitive loads impair dual-task walking, especially when crossing obstacles of varying heights, and (2) if extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) could identify key features of walking while texting.

methodsTwenty participants completed the following conditions: baseline walking, Task (walking + Typing: copying sentences, or Texting: answering questions), Obstacle (walking + crossing obstacles of three heights: low, medium, high), and combined (Task + Obstacle). For texting performance, we computed the rate, accuracy, and dual-task cost (DTC). Gait measures included mean spatiotemporal parameters, coefficient of variation (%CV) for each parameter, and mediolateral trunk acceleration. Four machine learning models were trained for evaluation: K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machines, and Random Forest, XGBoost.

resultsXGBoost achieved the best performance, with a test weighted F1 score of 0.848, and identified rate, %CV for step and stride time, and DTC of rate as the most important features for classification of conditions. Task × Obstacle interaction was found for %CV of step time with greater variability during high obstacle crossing while Texting (β=1.742, p=0.029).

conclusionsFindings demonstrate that mobile phone use increases walking variability, particularly in complex environments. The result may lend weight to growing concerns about mobile phone use while walking in young adults.

Indexed as

CognitionGaitWalkingAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsDual-Task TestsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleYoung AdultDual Task WalkingMachine LearningObstacle CrossingTexting While WalkingXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42675937
PMCPMC13539739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.