ArticleJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2026
Increased Gait Variability while Texting and Walking with Added Cognitive Loads in Challenging Environments.
Article in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study investigated (1) whether additional cognitive loads impair dual-task walking, especially when crossing obstacles of varying heights, and (2) if extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) could identify key features of walking while texting.
methodsTwenty participants completed the following conditions: baseline walking, Task (walking + Typing: copying sentences, or Texting: answering questions), Obstacle (walking + crossing obstacles of three heights: low, medium, high), and combined (Task + Obstacle). For texting performance, we computed the rate, accuracy, and dual-task cost (DTC). Gait measures included mean spatiotemporal parameters, coefficient of variation (%CV) for each parameter, and mediolateral trunk acceleration. Four machine learning models were trained for evaluation: K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machines, and Random Forest, XGBoost.
resultsXGBoost achieved the best performance, with a test weighted F1 score of 0.848, and identified rate, %CV for step and stride time, and DTC of rate as the most important features for classification of conditions. Task × Obstacle interaction was found for %CV of step time with greater variability during high obstacle crossing while Texting (β=1.742, p=0.029).
conclusionsFindings demonstrate that mobile phone use increases walking variability, particularly in complex environments. The result may lend weight to growing concerns about mobile phone use while walking in young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42675937PMC13539739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.