ArticleMedicine2026
Causal relationship between asthma and hernia risk: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidemiological associations between asthma and various hernia subtypes have been reported, but the causality and direction remain unclear. This study employs a two‑sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to systematically assess the causal associations between asthma and 6 hernia subtypes. Using publicly available summary data of genome-wide association studies, asthma was selected as the exposure, and diaphragmatic hernia, umbilical hernia, femoral hernia, hiatus hernia, inguinal hernia, and ventral hernia were selected as outcomes. Instrumental variables were strictly screened (F-statistic > 10). The inverse‑variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical approach, supplemented with MR Egger and weighted median methods. Sensitivity analyses included heterogeneity tests, horizontal pleiotropy tests, Steiger directionality tests, leave‑one‑out analyses, and Radial MR. Reverse MR was performed for validation. Forward MR analyses revealed a significant positive causal effect of asthma on diaphragmatic hernia (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.31, P < .001) and a suggestive association with umbilical hernia (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.34, P = .007). The umbilical hernia association was significant only by the inverse‑variance weighted method; weighted median (P = .102) and MR-Egger (P = .210) estimates were not statistically significant, and the estimate attenuated after outlier removal (confirmatory OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.26, P = .028). Sensitivity analyses showed no significant heterogeneity or pleiotropy. Reverse MR did not identify significant causal effects of hernias on asthma, although power limitations for certain hernia subtypes should be considered. No significant associations were observed between asthma and the other hernia subtypes, although the null findings for femoral and ventral hernias should be interpreted with caution due to limited statistical power. This study provides genetic evidence supporting asthma as a causal risk factor for diaphragmatic hernia, with a suggestive association for umbilical hernia. The diaphragmatic hernia finding was robust across multiple sensitivity analyses, whereas the umbilical hernia association was less consistent and requires further confirmation. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanistic links between asthma and specific hernia subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.