ArticleMedicine2026
Diagnostic accuracy of intelligent quick MR reconstruction for grading posterior cruciate ligament injuries: A retrospective study with arthroscopic correlation.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study aimed to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of intelligent quick magnetic resonance(IQMR) reconstruction for grading posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries, using arthroscopy as the reference standard. A total of 110 patients with arthroscopically confirmed PCL injuries were included, and their preoperative magnetic resonance images were processed with both standard and IQMR reconstructions. Two independent radiologists assessed subjective image quality using a 4-point Likert scale and objective metrics including signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio. Diagnostic performance for detecting complete (grade 3) and partial (grade 1 and 2) tears was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves, and interobserver agreement was evaluated with weighted kappa statistics. Compared with standard reconstruction, IQMR reconstruction yielded significantly superior subjective and objective image quality (all P < 0.005) and excellent interobserver agreement (weighted kappa = 0.63-0.97). Diagnostic correlation with arthroscopy showed robust performance for complete tears (area under the curve = 0.79, P < 0.05) but limited efficacy for partial tears (area under the curve = 0.54 and 0.17 for grade 1 and 2, respectively), with overall moderate agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic grading (kappa = 0.57). In conclusion, IQMR reconstruction significantly improves image quality for PCL assessment, leading to excellent diagnostic reliability for complete tears, while its performance for partial tears remains limited. Further prospective multi-center studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.