ArticleMedicine2026
Investigating the causal role of smoking in gout: A triangulation approach combining NHANES data, genetic correlation, and Mendelian randomization.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between smoking and the development of gout is not well understood. To address this, we adopted a triangulation framework that integrates observational analysis, genetic correlation estimation, and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to examine whether smoking confers a causal risk for gout. We first performed a cross-sectional analysis using information for 13,626 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2013 and 2018. The association of smoking with gout was subsequently assessed through logistic regression models. We next investigated the extent of shared genetic factors between smoking phenotypes and gout. We were able to demonstrate this using the linkage disequilibrium score regression applied to genome-wide association study data of European ancestry. Finally, to verify the causality of our relationship, we carried out a two-sample MR analysis. We selected the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method and confirmed the consistency of using the IVW method with other statistical methods, including weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode, as well as MR-Egger regression. We performed sensitivity analyses to investigate the heterogeneity of the hypothesis and stability of the data. Our findings based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data reveal that there is a strong positive association between smoking and the risk of gout (odds ratio [OR] = 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.48-2.55, P < .001). This association persisted after confounding adjustments (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.04-1.91, P = .027). In the subgroup analyses, former smokers and current smokers of 10 to 20 cigarettes per day had a substantially increased risk. Post-linkage disequilibrium score regression analysis revealed that the significantly positive genetic correlations of smoking initiation and lifetime smoking index with gout risk were both significantly positive. Additional evidence for causality is presented by MR. Genetic prediction of smoking initiation statistically increases gout risk (IVW OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.26-1.90, P = 3.17 × 10-5). A much stronger association is evident for lifetime smoking index (IVW OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.44-2.76, P = 3.24 × 10-5). These findings are the same with or without heterogeneity by sensitivity analysis. In light of our integrated analysis, smoking is a causative factor for gout. This suggests that public health interventions like anti-smoking campaigns might reduce gout incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.