ArticleMedicine2026
Early real-world utilization of ADA-adaz (Hyrimoz) in the United States: A retrospective claims-based descriptive study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adalimumab (ADA)-adaz (Hyrimoz®; Sandoz, Inc.) became available in the United States (US) in July 2023. This study assessed real-world ADA-adaz adoption experience by describing characteristics and treatment history of patients initiating ADA-adaz in the months following its US availability and preliminarily assessing persistence and adherence to ADA-adaz. A retrospective cohort study using open and closed claims from Komodo Research Data (01/2016-05/2024) was conducted. The index date was the first ADA-adaz prescription after July 2023. For the demographics and clinical assessment subgroup, ≥12 months of continuous data availability pre-index (baseline period) was required. For the persistence and adherence assessment subgroup, ≥3 months of continuous health plan enrollment post-index (study period) was required. Persistence was measured as time from index to the earlier of switch or discontinuation (45-day gap). Adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC) while on ADA-adaz. A total of 23,737 patients with an ADA-adaz prescription after July 2023 were included. For patients in the demographics and clinical assessment subgroup, the median age was 49.0 years, 59.4% were female, and 91.0% had commercial insurance. Patients received ADA-adaz mostly for rheumatoid arthritis (33.0%) and Crohn disease (23.2%). Common baseline comorbidities included hyperlipidemia (29.2%), hypertension (29.0%), anxiety (22.8%), and osteoarthritis (21.4%). During baseline, 93.2% of patients received a biologic; 98.2% received the reference ADA, and 83.0% were treated with biologics for at least 6 to 12 months. Other baseline treatments included systemic corticosteroids (52.3%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (35.4%), and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (34.6%). Of the 1108 (4.7%) patients in the persistence and adherence assessment subgroup, persistence at 3 months was 65.7%, and average PDC was 93.9% while on ADA-adaz. These findings should be interpreted with caution due to limited follow-up availability. In summary, patients who initiated ADA-adaz in the months following its US availability were predominantly commercially insured. The high rate of prior ADA use highlighted a transition to biosimilars in biologic-experienced patients. The end of ADA-adaz persistence was largely driven by switching to other ADA treatments. Among patients with available short-term follow-up, adherence while on ADA-adaz was high. Further studies with longer follow-up can assess ADA-adaz utilization patterns and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.