ArticleMedicine2026
Nurses' challenges and successes in caring for Syrian refugees: A qualitative phenomenological study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Türkiye hosts the world's largest Syrian refugee population. This places major demands on healthcare staff. Nurses in border areas such as Hatay face specific challenges. They must provide care that respects cultural differences. This study explored the lived experiences of Turkish nurses caring for Syrian refugees. It focused on care challenges and successful adaptation strategies. This qualitative phenomenological study used Colaizzi's 7-step method. It included 16 nurses in Hatay, Türkiye. All participants provided direct care to Syrian refugees. Data were collected through face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. Each interview lasted 30 to 40 minutes. Trustworthiness was supported by member checking, peer debriefing, and an audit trail. Four main themes emerged from the analysis. The first theme covered challenges in working with refugees. Nurses described different health beliefs and language barriers. These barriers made it difficult to obtain accurate health histories. The second theme concerned difficulty in understanding health needs. It included gender-sensitive care, signs of trauma, and symptoms lost in translation. The third theme covered barriers to healthcare access. These included fear of procedures, long registration steps, and a lack of trained interpreters. The fourth theme focused on support and successful strategies. Nurses used mobile translation applications, help from coworkers, professional networks, and emotional regulation strategies. These methods offered immediate help, but sustainable support systems were limited. Nurses caring for Syrian refugees showed resilience and developed informal coping strategies. However, institutional support remained limited. Training programs should be revised. Staff also need reliable human and digital resources. These resources may reduce cultural and language barriers in refugee care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.