Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675661›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2026

A Delphi Study to Develop a Core Outcome Set for Capturing and Measuring Nurse Well-Being.

Naomi Klepacz, David S Baldwin, Gemma Simons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naomi KlepaczDepartment of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK, exeter.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-8000
David S BaldwinNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Wessex (ARC Wessex), Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-0907
Gemma SimonsNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Wessex (ARC Wessex), Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2454-5948

Funding

National Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor nurse well-being is a significant concern, adversely affecting patient care quality and satisfaction and contributing to poor job satisfaction, increased sickness absence and workforce retention issues. There are calls for evidence-based policies and interventions to address poor nurse well-being, but no consensus exists on which outcomes should be captured to assess nurse well-being. We used a salutogenic and consensus approach to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for nurse well-being.

methodsA Delphi methodology was employed. Participants were recruited from two stakeholder groups: (1) nurse well-being professionals, identified through relevant publications, conference/meeting attendance lists and peer recommendations, and (2) registered nurses working in the UK National Health Service (NHS), recruited via social media, professional nursing bodies and practitioner networks. The stakeholder panel completed two rounds of an online Delphi survey, rating 43 previously identified well-being outcomes on a nine-point Likert scale, from 'not important' to 'critical.' Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of stakeholders agreeing a well-being outcome was critical for inclusion in the COS.

resultsFifty-four stakeholders completed the first Delphi round, and 45 participated in both rounds. Thirteen well-being outcomes met the a priori threshold for inclusion in the COS: general well-being, health, sleep, positive relationships, personal safety, psychological need satisfaction, psychological safety, job satisfaction, morale, life-work balance, compassion satisfaction, satisfaction with patient care and good nursing practice. The final COS was agreed by the stakeholder panel, without amendments.

conclusionThis study establishes a COS defining the nurse well-being outcomes that should be captured when assessing nurse well-being. Appropriate existing measurement instruments can be selected to capture these outcomes; future research is needed to identify and evaluate the most appropriate instruments and assess the feasibility of routinely capturing all 13 outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The COS provides nurse managers and workforce leaders with an agreed set of outcomes to support consistent nurse well-being measurement, benchmarking and workforce monitoring. Its use can support evaluation of well-being interventions, evidence-informed decision-making and the development of strategies and workplaces that enable nurses to thrive.

Indexed as

NursesOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultConsensusDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomCore Outcome SetDelphi studyNHSnurse well-beingnursing workforce

Identifiers

PMID42675661
PMCPMC13530399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.