ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Design of peptides with noncanonical amino acids using flow matching.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted design of self-assembling peptide hydrogels for neural regeneration: Principles and opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Applications and limitations of AI tools in enzyme design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe canonical vocabulary of 20 amino acids limits the chemical space available to proteins and peptides. Expanding this vocabulary to hundreds of noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) allows the engineering of proteins with novel function and activity, and is of particular interest for therapeutic peptides such as macrocycles, where ncAAs can improve proteolytic stability, membrane permeability, and immunogenicity. However, existing structure-based design tools either cannot model ncAAs at all, or are restricted to a small, fixed vocabulary of ncAAs seen during training, and ncAA data in the Protein Data Bank is scarce and heavily biased.
resultsWe present NCFlow, a flow matching generative model that places any arbitrary ncAA into a given protein backbone using only its atom types and bond connectivity, and therefore generalizes to ncAAs never seen during training. To supplement sparse training data in the Protein Data Bank, NCFlow is pretrained on millions of small molecule structures and a large set of protein-ligand complexes before finetuning on native noncanonicals found within proteins. NCFlow outperforms AlphaFold3-based methods in the structure prediction of unseen ncAAs. We further present a peptide design pipeline akin to in silico deep mutational scanning, and propose a scoring strategy combining deep learning-based and molecular dynamics-based alchemical binding free energy calculations to identify improved peptide variants. We apply the method on four protein-peptide complex test cases, and observe that incorporating noncanonicals can improve predicted binding affinity by up to -7.0 kcal/mol. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: NCFlow is freely available at https://github.com/mjslee0921/ncflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.