ArticleThe Gerontologist2026
Beyond attendance: participation and relational work in planned group recreational activities in a long-term care village setting.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPerson-centered care (PCC) has shaped dementia care reforms and informed innovative long-term care models such as care villages. Recreational activities are often seen as a site where PCC is enacted, yet little empirical work has examined how participation in structured activities is enabled, mediated, and constrained through everyday social, relational, and organizational dynamics. This study examines how participation in structured group activities was produced in a care village. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsAn ethnographic study was conducted in Canada's first publicly funded care village, drawing on 100 hr of participant observation, 12 staff interviews, and informal resident conversations. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsParticipation varied across activity types and residents' fluctuating comfort, stamina, and readiness. For many residents, participation was not simply an individual decision but was scaffolded through staff invitation, accessible information, relational familiarity, and individualized encouragement. It also depended on logistical and organizational conditions, including preparation, transportation, staffing coordination, and role boundaries. These findings show that participation was relationally and organizationally produced rather than simply a matter of resident preference or program design. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Structured activities can support meaningful engagement when sustained by relational, logistical, and organizational work. The findings clarify how PCC commitments such as choice, autonomy, and inclusion are enacted through activity systems, while highlighting the labor-intensive conditions required for more equitable participation. These insights have implications for staffing, coordination, and activity provision in care villages and long-term care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.