Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675567›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of older people nursing2026

Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Case Management in Community Settings Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Katsuma Mieda, Miki Kameyama, Erika Ota, Masako Yamada

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of older people nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katsuma MiedaGraduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1200-7416
Miki KameyamaGraduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1746-5479
Erika OtaGraduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3945-7441
Masako YamadaGraduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5750-1430

Funding

Japanese Certified Nurse Administrator Association Research Grant FY2026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntegrated, people-centred care requires continuity and coordination across services, and nurses increasingly contribute to case management; however, evidence on its effectiveness for older adults living at home remains limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led case management for community-dwelling older adults compared with usual care.

methodsPubMed, CINAHL, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 13 August 2025, for randomised controlled trials comparing nurse-led case management with usual care among community-dwelling older adults with frailty or risk of functional impairment. Primary outcomes were institutionalisation, hospital admissions and mortality. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, emergency department visits, physical function, costs, client satisfaction and days living at home. This review was reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020.

resultsFifteen trials involving 7995 participants were included. The evidence was of very low certainty for institutionalisation, mortality and hospital admissions, with pooled estimates indicating little to no difference. Nurse-led case management probably results in a slight improvement in the physical aspect of quality of life (SMD 0.08, 95% CI 0.00-0.15; moderate certainty). It probably also results in a slight improvement in the mental aspect of quality of life, although the confidence interval included no effect and probably results in little to no difference in physical function. Evidence regarding emergency department visits was of very low certainty.

conclusionThe evidence for the effects of nurse-led case management on institutionalisation, hospital admissions and mortality was of very low certainty. Nurse-led case management probably results in a slight improvement in the physical aspect of quality of life, although the clinical importance of this effect remains uncertain. Implementation and evaluation should align with the current uncertainty regarding healthcare utilisation outcomes and include patient-reported outcomes alongside utilisation outcomes. Future research and policy evaluation should use frameworks that assess long-term continuity and coordination of care and system-level impacts, in addition to individual health outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Nurse-led case management may yield a small improvement in physical quality of life for community-dwelling older adults, while effects on institutionalization, hospital admissions and mortality should be interpreted cautiously because the certainty of evidence is very low. Routine evaluation of nurse-led case management should include patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life, alongside healthcare utilization outcomes.

trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD420251114141.

Indexed as

Case ManagementGeriatric NursingIndependent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overHumansQuality of Lifecare coordinationcommunity‐dwelling older adultscontinuity of careintegrated carenurse‐led case managementquality of lifesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42675567
PMCPMC13530318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.