Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675533›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2026

Influence of Chlamydia suis on reproductive outcome in farms with and without tetracycline treatment of sows.

Gertrude Baumgartner, René Brunthaler, Lara Ergin, Michaela Koch, Manolis Lyrakis, Karoline Waldner, Andrea Buzanich-Ladinig, Christine Unterweger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gertrude BaumgartnerClinical Department for Farm Animals and Food System Transformation, Clinical Centre for Population Medicine in Fish, Pig and Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Vienna, Austria. gertrude.baumgartner@vetmeduni.ac.at.
René BrunthalerDepartment of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, Centre for Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lara ErginClinical Department for Farm Animals and Food System Transformation, Clinical Centre for Population Medicine in Fish, Pig and Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michaela KochClinical Department for Farm Animals and Food System Transformation, Clinical Centre for Population Medicine in Fish, Pig and Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Manolis LyrakisDepartment of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, Platform for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karoline WaldnerInstitute for Veterinary Disease Control, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Robert Koch-Gasse 17, 2340, Mödling, Austria.
Andrea Buzanich-LadinigClinical Department for Farm Animals and Food System Transformation, Clinical Centre for Population Medicine in Fish, Pig and Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christine UnterwegerClinical Department for Farm Animals and Food System Transformation, Clinical Centre for Population Medicine in Fish, Pig and Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

DaFNE grant of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Climate, and Environmental Protection, Regions and Water Management, Republic of Austria 101827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine genital chlamydiosis is considered a potential cause of reproductive failure, with Chlamydia (C.) suis being the most prevalent chlamydial species. To assess its pathogenic relevance, 50 Austrian piglet-producing farms were investigated: 40 farms with reproductive disorders (20 with tetracycline-treatment (tet), 20 without (no-tet)) and 10 clinically unaffected control farms. Samples from 770 sows (tet: n = 333, no-tet: n = 337, control: n =100) including blood, cervical and rectal swabs, dust samples and one pooled nursery fecal sample per farm were analyzed. Thirty-seven reproductive-tracts and six abortion cases were examined. Species-specific real-time PCR detected cervical C. suis shedding in 2.1% of sows (tet: n =5, no-tet: n = 10, control: n = 1). Rectal shedding was found on 45 farms and in 39.7% of sows overall (tet: n = 37.8%, no-tet: n = 39.2%, control: n = 48%). C. pecorum DNA was identified in one cervical and seven rectal swabs. Chlamydiaceae-specific antibodies were detected by complement fixation test on all farms and in 49.8% of sows overall, without association between study group and shedding or serological status. C. suis DNA was detected in 28% of dust and 96% of nursery fecal samples, whereas reproductive tract and abortion material were largely PCR-negative. Analyzing 42 C. suis isolates high rates of tetracycline resistance were found in all study groups via tetA(C) PCR (tet: n = 93.75%, no-tet: n = 78.3%, control: n = 100%) and in vitro susceptibility testing (tet: n = 75%, no-tet: n = 60.8%, control: n = 100%). Parity had negative effects on clinical signs, rectal shedding and antibody expression. C. suis appears to play a limited role in reproductive failure, while routine tetracycline treatment should be critically reconsidered due to frequent resistance.

Indexed as

Abortion, VeterinaryAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlamydiaChlamydia InfectionsSwine DiseasesTetracyclineAnimalsAustriaFemalePregnancySus scrofaSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsTetracyclineChlamydiaceae-specific antibodiesChlamydia pecorumChlamydia suisGenital chlamydiosisgenital tractparityreproductive disordertetA(C) genetetracycline resistancetetracycline treatment

Identifiers

PMID42675533
PMCPMC13527907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.