Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675527›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026

Letter to the Editor regarding "Social media use and roles of self-objectification, self-compassion and body image concerns: a systematic review".

Dwi Prasetyo, Tia Saraswati

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dwi PrasetyoDepartment of Communication Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia. dwiprasetyo@unesa.ac.id.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7261-4496
Tia SaraswatiDepartment of Japanese Literature, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4716-7826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The systematic review by Sarda et al. synthesizes relationships among social media use, self-objectification, self-compassion, and body image concerns while evaluating evidence relevant to the revised objectification theory model proposed by Wollast and colleagues. This letter extends the authors' call for more rigorous examination of social media use by arguing for greater specificity in conceptualizing digitally mediated appearance experiences. Rather than treating social media as a single exposure or relying on a broad passive/active distinction, we propose examining configurations of content, communicative practices, interpersonal feedback, social comparison, and platform-level curation as "patterned communicative experiences." These experiences can be investigated through activity-specific measures, ecological momentary assessment, digital traces, content analysis, and longitudinal designs. Self-compassion should remain an intrapersonal psychological construct, while communication environments are better treated as contextual conditions that may facilitate or inhibit its activation. Integrating objectification theory, communication psychology, and social media literacy may therefore clarify when and how digital experiences contribute to body surveillance, body shame, and eating disorder risk.

Indexed as

Body image concernsCommunication psychologyEating disordersSelf-compassionSelf-objectificationSocial media literacySocial media use

Identifiers

PMID42675527
PMCPMC13531805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.