ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
From patient to partner: reflections on being a patient leader in the COMFORT Nursing Programme.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeaningful patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly recognised as an important component of health research. However, relatively few publications describe patient involvement from the first-person perspective of a patient partner or patient leader. This commentary reflects on my experience as a patient leader in the COMFORT Nursing Programme, a research programme developing person-centred approaches to symptom management for people living with advanced kidney disease and their informal caregivers. MAIN BODY: I reflect on my experiences as a person living with kidney failure, an informal caregiver, and Chair of the Danish Kidney Association while working alongside researchers in the COMFORT Nursing Programme. I describe what motivated my involvement, how an equal partnership was developed, and how my lived experience, patient-leadership role and wider contact with patients and informal caregivers contributed to the research. My involvement included reviewing study materials and language, contributing to research discussions and priorities, supporting recruitment of patient partners, and participating in dissemination. I also reflect on the time and commitment required for intensive patient involvement, the challenges posed by fluctuating health, and the need for research teams to accommodate different preferences and capacities for participation.
conclusionMy experience illustrates that patient leadership can extend beyond sharing personal experiences to contributing to research priorities, methods, communication and dissemination. Patients and informal caregivers can bring forms of expertise that complement clinical and research knowledge. Meaningful involvement should therefore provide genuine opportunities to influence research while remaining flexible enough to accommodate individual needs, health circumstances and preferred levels of participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.