ArticleEcho research and practice2026
First we feast: a narrative review of postprandial assessment of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Article in Echo research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction is a common and consequential feature of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), present in a majority of patients at rest or with provocation, and it directly influences symptom burden and eligibility for therapy. When obstruction is absent at rest it can be provoked by physiologic stimuli, including the ingestion of a meal, a phenomenon patients have reported for decades. Whether postprandial assessment improves detection of obstructive physiology over conventional provocative testing has not been systematically examined.
methodsWe searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception through June 2025. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Because of substantial heterogeneity in study protocols and outcome definitions, we performed a narrative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis.
resultsSeven studies met inclusion criteria, published between 1991 and 2024 across three countries. Across these studies, postprandial assessment consistently provoked higher LVOT gradients than fasting measurement and identified obstructive physiology in patients with no obstruction on conventional testing. In the most rigorous comparative study, postprandial echocardiography identified gradients ≥ 30 mmHg in 74% of patients with no resting obstruction, compared with 23% by Valsalva maneuver (p < 0.001). In the largest cohort (n = 252), postprandial testing identified gradients ≥ 50 mmHg in an additional 35.7% of patients who did not reach that threshold under routine conditions. Invasive hemodynamic data provide a mechanistic basis: meal ingestion reduced systemic vascular resistance and raised cardiac filling pressures, conditions that favor dynamic obstruction.
conclusionsPostprandial LVOT assessment identifies obstructive physiology that conventional provocative maneuvers miss. As approved medical therapies targeting LVOT obstruction reshape HCM management, accurate identification of the obstructive phenotype carries direct therapeutic consequences. Standardized multicenter validation is needed, but existing evidence supports consideration of postprandial testing in symptomatic patients who remain without obstruction on conventional assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.