Observational studyIsrael journal of health policy research2026
When social media becomes medicine: clinician-moderated online consultations as an informal healthcare access point.
Observational study in Israel journal of health policy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial media has evolved significantly as a platform for healthcare communication, education, and consultation, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. While these platforms are increasingly used for medical advice, they operate largely outside formal health policy frameworks, creating a growing "informal layer" of healthcare.
methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted using an anonymous online questionnaire distributed to the "Ask an M.D." group members from April to July 2023. Demographic characteristics, consultation patterns, motivations for using the platform, and comparisons between users from central and peripheral regions of Israel were analyzed, to identify potential disparities in digital health access.
resultsOf approximately 19,000 members who viewed the survey, 1,508 responded (8%). Respondents were predominantly female (85%), with a mean age of 38.5 years, and 61.5% reported higher education. Common reasons for using the group included seeking a second opinion (36%), delays in obtaining a doctor's appointment (34%), and urgent health concerns (28%). Consultation topics most often involved gynecology and obstetrics (19%), pediatrics (15%), and dermatology (10.5%). Peripheral respondents were underrepresented relative to their proportion in the wider population. Within the respondent sample, central and peripheral participants showed broadly similar reported patterns of platform use.
conclusionsClinician-moderated social media groups such as "Ask an M.D." may serve as a supplementary source of health information and informal consultation for some users, particularly when immediate formal care is less accessible. The lower representation of peripheral respondents in this survey should be interpreted cautiously and may reflect differences in survey exposure, response propensity, platform reach, or other factors. Because this study did not assess clinical outcomes, it cannot determine whether participation in the platform improves care, safety, or health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.