ReviewNeurological research and practice2026
Real-world experience with foslevodopa/foscarbidopa in Germany: therapeutic insights and lessons learned.
Review in Neurological research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) often need to continue with device-aided therapies (DAT), such as intestinal and subcutaneous infusion therapies. Recently, continuous subcutaneous administration of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa (LDp/CDp) has emerged as a new therapeutic method. Two years after its approval in Germany, a large amount of real-world experience has been collected. Based on this, we present important practical recommendations to help clinicians optimise treatment. Key topics include identifying suitable patients, approaches to initiation and dose determination as well as strategies for balancing LDp/CDp with concomitant oral dopaminergic therapies. Practical challenges, particularly infusion site reactions and neuropsychiatric vulnerability in older or cognitively impaired patients, are discussed, and recommendations are presented on how to prevent and manage these adverse effects during routine management. The review also addresses reasons for discontinuation, organisational factors relevant to real-world implementation and future directions in pump technology. Overall, LDp/CDp is effective in managing motor fluctuations and provides sustained benefits with an overall favourable tolerability profile. Dermatological reactions are common but manageable, and careful adjustment of oral medication rather than rapid pursuit of monotherapy is advisable. The rate of early discontinuation has decreased with growing clinical experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.