SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Clear aligner therapy for adult anterior open bite: a systematic review, descriptive evidence map, and certainty appraisal of reported dentoskeletal changes.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClear aligner therapy is increasingly used for adult anterior open-bite correction, but the certainty of evidence, reported dentoskeletal changes, and clinical boundaries of this approach remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to summarize overbite change and descriptively map the dentoskeletal findings reported in the current clinical literature.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were also checked, but no additional eligible records were identified. Eligible studies evaluated adult or predominantly adult cohorts with anterior open bite treated with clear aligners and reported overbite change or dentoskeletal outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Reported dentoskeletal findings were classified as direct, indirect, or insufficient evidence for mechanistic interpretation. Exploratory single-arm random-effects meta-analyses were performed when extractable completed-treatment data were available. Certainty of evidence was appraised using GRADE principles.
resultsTen clinical studies involving 421 aligner-treated participants were included. Most studies were retrospective and nonrandomized, and nine had serious overall risk of bias. The primary exploratory synthesis of five completed-treatment cohorts showed a pooled overbite increase of 3.07 mm, while an extended sensitivity analysis of seven studies yielded 2.89 mm. Heterogeneity was substantial. Reported dentoskeletal changes most commonly involved anterior dentoalveolar changes, variable posterior vertical change, and limited mandibular plane change. Most studies were not designed to test mechanisms directly; therefore, the dentoskeletal findings were interpreted cautiously. The certainty of evidence was very low.
conclusionsVery low-certainty evidence suggests that selected adult anterior open-bite cases treated with clear aligners may show overbite improvement. However, the available evidence is insufficient to confirm predictable skeletal correction or to validate a single mechanism of bite closure. Future studies should use prospective comparative designs, standardized anterior open-bite phenotyping, direct component-level outcome assessment, blinded evaluation, and long-term retention endpoints.
trial registrationCRD420261376480.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.