SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Methods of incisor inclination control during the non-accelerated retraction of upper anterior teeth with fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtrusion of the maxillary incisors represents a frequent clinical challenge in orthodontic treatment. Current systematic reviews are limited in range and methods employed, while individual trials lack consensus on the most effective mechanics for retraction.
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various approaches used to control anterior tooth inclination during non‑accelerated retraction with buccal fixed appliances.
methodsA search of databases was conducted in September (2025) to identify randomized controlled trials using various methods and techniques to retract the upper anterior teeth. Eligible RCTs enrolling patients aged 12-35 years who underwent extraction of upper first premolars were included. Meta‑analyses used random‑effects models (RevMan 5.3). Certainty of evidence was appraised with GRADE.
resultsTwenty RCTs with 568 patients in total were included. Risk‑of‑bias was low in 11 trials, some concerns in 4, and high in 5. Pooled analyses showed that retraction produced clinically and statistically significant palatal crown inclination of the upper incisors across techniques: sliding en‑masse (MD ≈ - 9.8°; moderate certainty), loop‑based en‑masse (MD ≈ - 13.3°; moderate certainty), and two‑step retraction (MD ≈ - 8.9°; moderate certainty). Loop‑based mechanics were associated with slightly greater retroclination than sliding (MD = 2.49°; statistically significant but not clinically meaningful; moderate certainty). Comparisons of en‑masse versus two‑step retraction showed no significant difference (very low certainty). Vertical incisal changes were inconsistently reported and supported by very low‑certainty evidence. Heterogeneity varied from low to considerable across analyses.
conclusionAnterior teeth retraction is generally associated with clinically meaningful incisor retroclination. Loop-based mechanics appear to produce slightly greater retroclination than sliding, but the clinical relevance is limited. Evidence quality ranges from moderate to very low, and heterogeneity could not be avoided; high‑quality RCTs with standardized inclination measurements are needed to define optimal inclination‑control strategies.
trial registrationThe review protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251167359) during the early stages of the review process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.