ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2026
Trigeminal nociceptive somatotopy across brainstem and cortex and their functional interactions.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06534880, which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe trigeminal nerve innervates the face and the meninges via its three branches, with central relay neurons located in the brainstem's spinal trigeminal nucleus. We have shown a somatotopic organization on human brainstem level and aimed, using an independent new sample, to characterize the functional somatotopy with a focus on within-brainstem and brainstem-cortical connectivity.
methodsElectrical stimulation was applied to the three branches of the trigeminal nerve at two intensities (high and low) to examine the somatotopic organization in healthy participants during fMRI. Neuroimaging was preregistered (NCT06534880) and covered the upper spinal cord, brainstem, thalamus, insula, primary somatosensory cortex (S1), S2/parietal operculum, and cingulate cortex. Activation patterns following stimulation of each trigeminal branch were analyzed. Branch-specific functional connectivity was estimated within the brainstem as well as between brainstem and cortical targets.
resultsIn a cohort of 30 healthy participants (mean age 32.1 ± 8.8 years, 18 female (60%)), spatially distinct brainstem representations of the trigeminal branches were identified, replicating previous reports. Activation at the cortical level was largely bilateral and symmetric, except in the primary somatosensory cortex and the insula, where it was predominantly contralateral. Within the brainstem, functional connectivity was strongest between the left and right subnuclei at the same level and was independent of the stimulated branch (all F(2,116) ≤ 5.67, threshold F = 8.00, α = 0.05/90). Brainstem-cortex connectivity showed a robust rostrocaudal gradient that was modulated by the stimulated branch across insular, somatosensory, and opercular regions (significant in 37/48 ROIs, F-Range 2.46-5.19, P
conclusionWe replicated somatotopic representation of the three trigeminal branches in the brainstem and revealed distinct bilateral activation and branch-specific functional connectivity across multiple levels of the afferent neuraxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.