Observational studyBMC neurology2026
Living in the United States Stroke Belt and cognitive change in the Women's Health Study: a cohort study.
Observational study in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000479 (Women's Health Study of Low-dose Aspirin and Vitamin E in Apparently Healthy Women), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Women's Health Study of Low-dose Aspirin and Vitamin E in Apparently Healthy Women
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesResidence in the United States Stroke Belt has been linked to a higher stroke mortality rate, raising the question of whether this increased risk is also associated with other brain health outcomes, such as cognitive change, defined as within-person changes in cognitive performance over time. This study aimed to investigate if residing in the Stroke Belt is associated with cognitive decline compared to residing outside this region in a large cohort of women.
methodsWe used data from the cognitive cohort of the Women's Health Study, a U.S.-based cohort of predominantly White women currently or formerly employed in health professions. Our analyses included 6,362 women aged ≥65 years at baseline who underwent cognitive assessments. The exposure was residency in the Stroke Belt. Cognitive change was assessed as the primary outcome using repeated measures of a global cognitive composite score. Linear mixed-effects models were applied, adjusted for age, education, and lifestyle factors, measured by Life's Simple 7 score with random effects for each of the participating women (fully adjusted model). Secondary analyses used logistic regression to examine the association between Stroke Belt residency and the odds of belonging to the first quintile or first decile of the cognitive change distribution (secondary outcome), representing women with the greatest cognitive decline.
resultsOf the participating women, 1,131 (17.8%) resided within the Stroke Belt. Compared to women residing outside the Stroke Belt, women residing in the Stroke Belt did not have significantly different rates of cognitive decline. The fully adjusted difference in change in the global cognitive composite score from the first to the last assessment between women living inside and outside the Stroke Belt was β = -0.03, SE = 0.02, p = 0.233. Women residing in the Stroke Belt had higher odds of being in the first quintile (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.42) and in the first decile (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.78) of the cognitive change distribution. DISCUSSION: Residence in the U.S. Stroke Belt was not associated with overall differences in cognitive decline trajectories, although secondary analyses suggested a possible increase in more pronounced decline among women living in the region. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000479; retrospectively submitted: October 27, 1999.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.