Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675370›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2026

Lipoprotein(a): Cardiovascular Risk and Emerging Targeted Therapies.

José Pablo Miramontes González

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

José Pablo Miramontes GonzálezDepartamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valladolid, Av. Ramón y Cajal, 7, CP 47003, Valladolid, Spain. jpmiramontes@uva.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-9679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined, low-density lipoprotein-like particle that has emerged as an important and independent contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Elevated Lp(a) concentrations, defined as approximately 125 nmol/L (≥ 50 mg/dL) by most consensus thresholds, affect an estimated 20% of the general population and confer lifelong inherited cardiovascular risk that is not adequately captured by standard lipid panels. Epidemiological, observational and genetic studies consistently show that elevated Lp(a) concentrations are associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Unlike low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, Lp(a) levels remain relatively stable throughout life and are only minimally influenced by lifestyle interventions or most conventional lipid-lowering therapies. This creates a clinically relevant therapeutic gap, particularly in patients with premature cardiovascular disease, recurrent events despite optimal LDL cholesterol control, or otherwise unexplained residual risk. Traditional lipid-lowering strategies remain essential to reduce global cardiovascular risk, but they have limited ability to directly modify Lp(a)-mediated risk. PCSK9 inhibitors and inclisiran produce modest (approximately 20-30%) Lp(a) reductions, and lipoprotein apheresis may be useful in highly selected patients, but none represents a broadly applicable Lp(a)-specific therapy. Recent advances have changed this landscape. Antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA therapies and oral small-molecule inhibitors have demonstrated profound and durable Lp(a) reductions, frequently exceeding 80-100% with small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based agents (olpasiran, zerlasiran, lepodisiran), up to 80% with the antisense oligonucleotide pelacarsen, and up to 85% with the oral small-molecule muvalaplin, in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials. However, the central question remains whether pharmacological Lp(a) lowering translates into fewer cardiovascular events. Current evidence supports strong biological efficacy, but definitive proof of clinical benefit awaits ongoing randomized cardiovascular outcomes trials, including Lp(a)HORIZON (pelacarsen), OCEAN(a)-Outcomes (olpasiran) and ACCLAIM-Lp(a) (lepodisiran). This narrative review summarizes the biology and epidemiological relevance of Lp(a), quantifies its association with cardiovascular events, reviews the effect of traditional lipid-lowering therapies on Lp(a) and critically discusses emerging Lp(a)-targeted treatments and future directions.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.