ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Subjective age of acquisition norms for 30,849 Russian words.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age of acquisition (AoA) is a key psycholinguistic variable known to influence lexical and conceptual processing across a broad range of tasks. However, existing Russian datasets are small and mainly limited to picturable nouns and verbs. In this study, we collected AoA ratings for 30,849 Russian words that represent a broad vocabulary range. Ratings were collected from 2,201 adult respondents in both in-person and online sessions. Reliability assessed via bootstrap split-half correlations was high (mean r = 0.895, 95% CI [.893, .897]). To validate the subjective AoA estimates, we administered vocabulary tests to school students from grades 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Two validation procedures were used: grade-level validation and within-grade validation. The former related the grade level at which an item was reliably known with the adult ratings, the latter related adult AoA to students' accuracy. Subjective AoA strongly predicted objective AoA measures (r = 0.805) and showed consistent negative relations with student accuracy across grades. Correlations with existing Russian AoA datasets (r = 0.68-0.91) further supported the reliability of the norms. The new ratings also showed expected correlations with word frequency, length, concreteness, imageability, and familiarity. The resulting norms provide the largest and most comprehensive AoA resource for the Russian language and can support future research in psycholinguistics, lexical processing, and language development. All norms are publicly available on OSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.